This article looks at how these multinational virtualization and networking giants fare when. Though VMware is the market leader for virtualization solutions, there’s something to be said for open-source alternatives with enterprise-level support like Oracle’s VirtualBox.

Xhyve looks good but it's going to be a long time before anyone really cares about Windows performance. VirtualBox vs VMware: Choosing the Best Virtualization Tool. I've had some thoroughly unpleasant experiences with VirtualBox and Windows but that was at least one major version ago.Īll three have horrendously bad UI's: Parallels's is condescending and stupid VMWare are competing hard but somehow manage to hold on to a shred of professionalism VirtualBox has by far the best UI, but hideous and still not actually any good. It is absolutely the only tool you need for container development and everything else is a bigger pain in the arse. VirtualBox is nowhere near as bad as it used to be but is still prone to running VM's very slowly under some as-yet undefined conditions. Whereas VirtualBox is less resource heavy and much simpler to use, it lacks good integration with OS X and other features. It is therefore worth it's frankly ridiculous price tag. I use Parallels 5 and used VirtualBox before I bought it. I don't see it being any better for any reason other than it actually works for what I need it for. I switched to Fusion for SmartOS development because the other two were having a real shit time booting it.

It's struggling a lot with the whole container thing though. Parallels has really good Windows support and is plenty good enough for most other things. I've just switched from years of Parallels to Fusion.

Virtualbox vs vmware for mac